Why it comes up: HireVue is the enterprise structured video-interview suite with a much larger installed base than lizzyAI's demo motion.
Stands out: Video interviews and validated assessments in one enterprise suite.
Watch out: No published price, and it is far heavier than a small team needs for async video.
Best for
- Enterprise talent teams standardising video interviews
- Teams that need assessments before an onsite
- High-volume employers that cannot run live first rounds
4.5 on Capterra from 50 reviews
Read the HireVue write-up · LizzyAI vs HireVue

Sales-quoted 6 day free trial
Why it comes up: Hubert is a quoted volume AI interviewer that publishes a 5,000-interview annual floor and a 6-month trial.
Stands out: HubertDetect marks AI-written answers. Recruiter Agent, chat and voice interviews, and explainable 0-100 scores land in the ATS. Delivery is SMS and web. The vendor claims GDPR and EU AI Act alignment.
Watch out: There is no dollar table. Volume starts at 5,000 interviews a year, which is not an SMB first buy. Unlimited users is in the custom plan, but you still buy interview volume.
Best for
- High-volume TA teams replacing CV screens with structured AI interviews
- Employers that need explainable, repeatable scores for audit or works-council review
- Volume desks that need scores and transcripts written back to the ATS
4.3 on Capterra from 16 reviews
Read the Hubert write-up · LizzyAI vs Hubert
Why it comes up: Curious Thing is another quoted voice AI interviewer aimed at scalable screening.
Stands out: Structured voice conversations at scale with a candidate-experience pitch, not a cheap SMS blaster.
Watch out: The vendor does not publish a pricing grid. Do not confuse it with the separate Lucy call-answering product sold at $24/mo.
Best for
- TA teams that want consistent first-round voice screens
- High-volume professional hiring
- Companies that will take a quote and an API
Read the Curious Thing write-up · LizzyAI vs Curious Thing
Why it comes up: FetchTalent publishes from $99/mo for AI phone and video screens with coding scorecards if you want a priced alternative.
Stands out: Live coding challenges run inside the same AI interview as the behavioral screen, with a cheat-detection report aimed at IT staffing submissions. Dual email and SMS reminders are used to cut no-shows.
Watch out: It is not an ATS. Pipeline, deletes, and offers stay in your system of record. After-hours interviews are a featured capability, so volume hiring can run while the desk is closed.
Best for
- IT staffing firms that need a coding scorecard and cheat-detection report on every submission
- Agencies that want AI phone screens after hours with SMS reminders
- TA teams that will keep Greenhouse or similar as the ATS of record
Read the FetchTalent write-up · LizzyAI vs FetchTalent