Free tools/Metrics calculators/Quality of hire

Quality of Hire Calculator: Weighted Score, Formula and Benchmarks

Score your new hires on performance, hiring manager satisfaction, retention and ramp time, with weights you set yourself. See the formula, a worked example and what published data says.

  • $0to use
  • Nosignup
  • 8inputs

The formula

Quality of hire score = (performance score × its weight + manager satisfaction score × its weight + retention rate × its weight + ramp rate × its weight) ÷ total of the weights, with every component on a 0 to 100 scale

Use the calculatorAll calculators

Quality of hire calculator

Calculate your quality of hire score

Average first review or 90 day rating for the hire cohort
From a short survey sent to each hiring manager
Percent of the cohort still on payroll
%
Percent who hit the agreed ramp milestone on time
%
Relative weight, not a percent. Weights are scaled to their total
Relative weight. Set to 0 to leave a component out
Relative weight. Retention lags, so many teams weight it lower early on
Relative weight. Useful for sales, support and agency desks

Quality of hire score (out of 100)

78.9

  • 76%Performance component
  • 82%Manager satisfaction component
  • 100Total of your weights

Weights do not need to add up to 100. The score divides by their total, so 35, 25, 25, 15 and 7, 5, 5, 3 give the same answer.

Runs in your browser. Nothing you type is sent or saved.

What does quality of hire measure?

Quality of hire measures how much value new employees add once they start. It answers the question every hiring manager asks six months later: did recruiting send us people who can do the job and who stay? Speed and cost metrics tell you how efficiently you hired. Quality of hire tells you whether the hiring was worth it.

There is no single official formula, which is why so few teams report it. The practical approach is a composite score built from three to five signals you already collect. This calculator uses four: the performance rating, hiring manager satisfaction, 12 month retention and ramp time. You choose how much each one counts, so the score matches what your business actually values.

Measure it for a cohort, not one person. A cohort is every hire who started in the same quarter, or every hire for one role family. Scoring individuals turns the metric into a performance review. Scoring cohorts tells you whether your sourcing, screening and interviewing produce better people over time.

How do you calculate quality of hire step by step?

Put every component on the same 0 to 100 scale, multiply each by its weight, add them up and divide by the total of the weights. The steps below work in a spreadsheet or in the calculator above.

  1. Pick the cohort: for example, all hires who started between January and March.
  2. Collect the average performance rating for the cohort from the first formal review or a 90 day check in, on a 1 to 5 scale.
  3. Send each hiring manager one question: how satisfied are you with this hire, from 1 to 5? Average the answers.
  4. Count how many hires in the cohort are still employed at 12 months and divide by the cohort size.
  5. Agree a ramp milestone per role before the hire starts, such as first closed deal or full caseload, and count the share who hit it on time.
  6. Convert the two 1 to 5 averages to percentages by dividing by 5 and multiplying by 100.
  7. Multiply each component by its weight, add the four results and divide by the sum of the weights.

What does a quality of hire example look like?

Say a team hired 20 people last year. Their average performance rating is 3.8 out of 5, managers rate their satisfaction 4.1 out of 5, 17 of the 20 are still employed at 12 months and 14 of the 20 hit the ramp milestone on time. These are illustrative numbers, not research.

With weights of 35, 25, 25 and 15, the score comes out at 78.9 out of 100. The table shows how each component contributes. Notice that ramp time pulls the score down most relative to its weight, which points to onboarding rather than selection.

ComponentRaw valueScore out of 100WeightWeighted points
Performance rating3.8 of 5763526.6
Manager satisfaction4.1 of 5822520.5
12 month retention17 of 20852521.25
Ramp on time14 of 20701510.5
Total  10078.85 ÷ 100 × 100 = 78.9

What is a good quality of hire score?

There is no published benchmark for a composite score like this one, because every company weights the parts differently. Compare your score with your own previous cohorts and between sources or recruiters, not with another company's number.

Published data does exist for the parts. Ashby analyzed over 35,000 quality of hire scorecards covering nearly 15,000 hires on a 1 to 5 scale and found that 73% of hires exceed expectations on their first score. By source, referred hires averaged 4.0, sourced hires 3.9 and inbound applicants 3.8. Ashby also found the first score predicts later ones fairly well: about 60% of hires end where they started.

On which parts to include, LinkedIn's 2025 Future of Recruiting report found that 66% of talent acquisition pros use job performance ratings, 60% use new hire retention and 44% use hiring manager satisfaction. The same report found 89% expect measuring quality of hire to grow in importance, but only 25% feel highly confident they measure it well. SHRM's 2025 benchmarking found only 20% of organizations track quality of hire at all.

How do you improve quality of hire?

Most quality problems start before the first interview. Fix the inputs to the process and the score follows.

  • Write success criteria at the intake meeting: what the person must achieve in 90 days and in a year. Those criteria become your ramp milestone and your scorecard.
  • Use structured interviews with a written scorecard so every candidate is judged on the same skills.
  • Compare scores by source every quarter and move budget toward the sources whose hires score highest, not the ones that send the most applicants.
  • Check the 30 and 90 day manager scores early. A low first score is a strong warning sign, so act on it with coaching instead of waiting for the annual review.
  • Treat ramp misses as an onboarding question first. Ask whether the new hire had access, training and a clear first project.

What mistakes should you avoid?

  • Changing the weights every quarter. Pick weights once a year or your trend line means nothing.
  • Scoring a cohort before it has a full year of tenure and then comparing it with older cohorts that do.
  • Letting the hiring manager who made the hire be the only rater, without any objective measure such as retention or ramp.
  • Using quality of hire to judge individual recruiters on small samples. Five hires is not enough to draw a conclusion.
  • Reading cost per hire or time to fill without this number beside it. A fast, cheap hire who leaves in four months is the most expensive hire you make.

Frequently asked questions

What is the simplest way to measure quality of hire?

Start with two numbers: the hiring manager's satisfaction score at 90 days and whether the hire is still employed at 12 months. Both are easy to collect and hard to argue with. Add the performance rating once your review cycle gives you consistent data, and add ramp time for roles with a clear productivity milestone such as sales or support.

How often should you calculate quality of hire?

Quarterly works for most teams. Score each quarterly hiring cohort at 90 days for the early signals, then update the same cohort at 12 months when retention is known. Report the 12 month version to leadership, because it includes the full picture, and use the 90 day version internally to spot problems while you can still act.

Should agencies measure quality of hire?

Yes, and clients notice when you do. Track how many placements pass the guarantee period, ask the client for a one question satisfaction score at 30 and 90 days, and note repeat orders from the same hiring manager. Those three numbers show a client that your placements stick, which is a stronger pitch than speed alone.

What weights should I use for quality of hire?

Weight the components your leaders already care about. A sales team may weight ramp time heavily, while a regulated employer may weight performance and retention. If you have no strong view, equal weights are a fair starting point. Write the weights down, keep them for at least a year and apply them to every cohort the same way.

Sources

Written by recruiters at Work Insiders. Updated October 25, 2026. How we make money.