
$149/mo 14 day free trial MCP API
Why it comes up: Broader talent graph with a $149/mo public entry. Less GitHub-native than Prog.ai.
Stands out: Diversity and internal-mobility filters on a very large people graph, plus MCP.
Watch out: AI screening is a paid add-on rather than included.
Best for
- Corporate talent teams on hard-to-find roles
- Diversity-focused search teams
- Organisations that want internal mobility next to external search
4.7 on Capterra from 189 reviews
Read the SeekOut write-up · Prog.ai vs SeekOut

$494/mo 7 day free trial API
Why it comes up: Outbound sourcing database across functions, not a code-contribution graph.
Stands out: Open-web sourcing plus sequences and contact data in one outbound product.
Watch out: No MCP, and $494/mo is a real floor, so this is not an SMB finder.
Best for
- Outbound talent teams sourcing beyond LinkedIn
- Desks that want sequences with the sourcer
- Buyers who will start on a seven-day trial
4.7 on Capterra from 103 reviews
Read the hireEZ write-up · Prog.ai vs hireEZ
Why it comes up: Tech sourcing extension, sales-quoted. Similar browser overlay, different graph.
Stands out: Chrome-first sourcing aimed specifically at engineering and product profiles.
Watch out: No published price, no API and no MCP.
Best for
- Tech recruiters sourcing engineers
- Desks that live in the browser on GitHub and LinkedIn
- Agencies hiring software talent
4.7 on Capterra from 17 reviews
Read the AmazingHiring write-up · Prog.ai vs AmazingHiring
Why it comes up: LinkedIn's own seat. Strong where engineers keep profiles, weak where they do not.
Stands out: It is the graph every other sourcing tool enriches from.
Watch out: It is supply, not a system of record, so you still need an ATS.
Best for
- Almost every in-house talent team
- Agency desks running InMail projects
- Sourcers who work the graph daily
4.5 on Capterra from 150 reviews
Read the LinkedIn Recruiter write-up · Prog.ai vs LinkedIn Recruiter