Why it comes up: Technical assessments and interviews for engineering roles.
Stands out: Chakra AI interviewer, Screen, and live Interview on every plan, with MCP and API on Enterprise.
Watch out: Starter and Pro do not include API or MCP. Extra attempts are $20 each. ATS hooks start on Pro.
Best for
- Small teams making first technical hires on Starter
- Growing teams that need Greenhouse, Lever, or Ashby on Pro
- Orgs that want an agentic IDE and AI-assisted scoring
Read the HackerRank write-up · iMocha vs HackerRank
Why it comes up: Broad skills test library with self-serve plans.
Stands out: A large test library with anti-cheating measures and a genuine free plan.
Watch out: The jump from Core to Plus is steep, and it is tests rather than video interviewing.
Best for
- Teams that want evidence before a live interview
- Organisations on the major applicant trackers
- Buyers replacing an enterprise assessment module
4.1 on Capterra from 267 reviews
Read the TestGorilla write-up · iMocha vs TestGorilla
Why it comes up: Engineering screens and live interviews at volume.
Stands out: Custom tasks can be built with MCP straight from your IDE and codebase on Scale and Custom plans.
Watch out: Starter is one platform user and 120 invites a year. ATS integrations, SSO and full API access are on the quote-based Custom plan.
Best for
- Engineering teams screening developers
- Growing teams with steady hiring volume
- Enterprises mapping engineering skills
Read the Codility write-up · iMocha vs Codility
Why it comes up: Enterprise psychometric and skills assessments.
Stands out: One of the broadest assessment portfolios in the market, with more than 80 ATS integrations.
Watch out: There is no self-serve plan. Buying runs through sales, and rollout is usually a scoped program rather than a quick setup.
Best for
- Global TA teams running assessment programs
- I/O psychology-led hiring processes
- Enterprises that buy through a formal RFP
Read the SHL write-up · iMocha vs SHL