Why it comes up: Agency ATS/CRM standard, from $99/user/mo, heavier implementation than Happlicant's self-serve seat.
Stands out: Staffing CRM plus a marketplace of more than 300 partners on Core.
Watch out: Only the two small-agency tiers are published. AI, automation and analytics all sit behind a quote.
Best for
- Staffing agencies
- Desks that need client management next to jobs
- Firms that live on the Bullhorn marketplace
4.0 on Capterra from 1,023 reviews
Read the Bullhorn write-up · Happlicant vs Bullhorn

$149/user/mo Free trial MCP API
Why it comes up: Recruiting CRM with published Core pricing at a higher per-user floor than $69.
Stands out: An ATS plus a sourcing database and MCP, built for agency desks.
Watch out: The published Core price is annual billing, and the MCP URL is issued in-product.
Best for
- Agencies that outgrew a spreadsheet and a job board
- Desks that want sourcing next to the ATS
- Teams that want MCP on the ATS of record
4.6 on Capterra from 134 reviews
Read the Loxo write-up · Happlicant vs Loxo
Why it comes up: Visual SMB ATS with a free tier. Built for in-house hiring, not agency BD pipelines.
Stands out: A kanban pipeline plus a sourcing extension, built for small hiring teams.
Watch out: No MCP, and it is not built for enterprise hiring processes.
Best for
- Small hiring teams that want a visual pipeline
- A first ATS after a spreadsheet
- Desks that source in the browser
4.5 on Capterra from 1,420 reviews
Read the Breezy HR write-up · Happlicant vs Breezy HR
Why it comes up: SMB ATS for HR teams. Lighter on agency CRM, client, and placement tracking.
Stands out: Simple job posting, scorecards and self-scheduling for small hiring teams.
Watch out: Billed annually rather than monthly, and job posting volume is capped on the entry plan.
Best for
- Small businesses buying a first ATS
- Teams that need scorecards without enterprise process
- Hiring managers who want self-scheduling links
4.3 on Capterra from 495 reviews
Read the JazzHR write-up · Happlicant vs JazzHR