Compare/Head to head

Carv vs Screenloop

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Carv

Sales-quoted

AI interview notes, write-ups, and ATS fill for recruiting agencies. Pricing is sales-quoted; the vendor publishes no prices and its recruiter product is on a waitlist.

Where Carv fits

  • Recruiting agencies that live on intake calls
  • Desks on Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable
  • Recruiters drowning in notes and write-ups
  • Teams that will accept AI in the interview workflow

Screenloop

Sales-quoted

Screenloop is an AI ATS with interview intelligence, references, and analytics. Packaging is quoted.

Where Screenloop fits

  • Growing TA teams that want ATS plus interview intelligence in one vendor
  • Companies replacing Greenhouse-plus-BrightHire with a single platform
  • Teams that care about structured references next to scorecards
  • EU and UK buyers already in Screenloop's geographic mix

At a glance

DetailCarvScreenloop
Starting priceSales-quotedSales-quoted
Free tier–No–No
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underAI note takers, InterviewingAI note takers, ATS, Interviewing

Where they pull apart

Carv

Stands out: Joins the interview, writes the note, and pushes a candidate presentation back to Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable.

Watch out: Packaging is demo-led and the product now leans toward agentic volume hiring. Carv for recruiters shows a join-the-waitlist sign-up, so confirm availability and price on a call before you budget.

Not the right fit for

  • Enterprises that need HireVue-style structured video
  • TA teams that will not record interviews
  • Buyers who need a published price grid

Screenloop

Stands out: Interview intelligence, structured references, and ATS analytics ship as one platform, not a BrightHire recorder bolted onto Greenhouse.

Watch out: screenloop.com does not list a public per-user rate. Mid-market TA rollouts go through sales. This is a system-of-record conversation, not a $15 ATS.

Not the right fit for

  • Agencies that need Bullhorn-class client and placement CRM
  • Startups that want a $49 self-serve ATS today

Pros and cons

Carv

  • Notes and write-ups that actually land in the ATS
  • Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, and Teams named
  • Built for agency intakes, not enterprise video exams
  • No published pricing grid
  • Product marketing has shifted toward agentic volume hiring
  • Recruiter product is on a waitlist

Screenloop

  • ATS, interview intelligence, and references in one platform
  • Analytics on the hiring funnel, not only a recorder
  • Aimed at in-house TA rather than a staffing desk CRM
  • Quoted, no public per-user grid
  • Wrong shape for agency BD and placements
  • Implementation is an ATS project, not a Chrome plugin

What each one costs

Carv

Sales-quoted

Carv no longer publishes prices. Its pricing page now redirects to the homepage, which offers a demo for its agentic volume-hiring platform and a waitlist for Carv for recruiters. Pricing is sales-quoted. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

Screenloop

Sales-quoted

Screenloop quotes its AI ATS, interview intelligence, and reference suite. screenloop.com does not list a public per-user rate. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

Common questions

Can you try Carv or Screenloop for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Carv alternatives All Screenloop alternatives Every AI note takers tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 4 Nov 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?