Head to head

Carv vs HireLogic

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Carv

$60/user/mo

AI interview notes, write-ups, and ATS fill for recruiting agencies. Recruitment Pro is commonly quoted at $60/user/mo; the vendor has no published price grid.

Where Carv fits

  • Recruiting agencies that live on intake calls
  • Desks on Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable
  • Recruiters drowning in notes and write-ups
  • Teams that will accept AI in the interview workflow

HireLogic

Sales-quoted

HireLogic is interview intelligence: structured notes, scoring, and signal from live interviews. The vendor does not publish a price. Access is quoted.

Where HireLogic fits

  • TA teams that want scorecards and notes from conversations they already run
  • Orgs standardizing live interview signal without buying an AI avatar interviewer
  • Recruiting leaders comparing BrightHire-class intelligence on a quote
  • Companies that will sit through a demo to size seats and volume

At a glance

DetailCarvHireLogic
Starting price$60/user/moSales-quoted
Free tier–No–No
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underInterviewingInterviewing

Where they pull apart

Carv

Stands out: Joins the interview, writes the note, and pushes a candidate presentation back to Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable.

Watch out: Packaging is demo-led and the product now leans toward agentic volume hiring, so confirm the seat price on a call rather than budgeting from the $60 figure. The five-meeting free plan is a usage cap, not a timed trial.

Not the right fit for

  • Enterprises that need HireVue-style structured video
  • TA teams that will not record interviews
  • Buyers who need a published price grid

HireLogic

Stands out: The product is built around live interview quality, structured notes, and scoring, rather than running an AI interviewer in place of your panel.

Watch out: hirelogic.ai does not print a plan table. If you need a self-serve notetaker with a checkout, look at tools that publish per-user rates. Do not confuse this with HireLogic the equipment-rental SKU.

Not the right fit for

  • Buyers who need a published $X/user/mo before a call
  • Teams that want the AI to conduct the screen instead of capturing it

Pros and cons

Carv

  • Notes and write-ups that actually land in the ATS
  • Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, and Teams named
  • Built for agency intakes, not enterprise video exams
  • No published pricing grid
  • Product marketing has shifted toward agentic volume hiring
  • Five-meeting free plan is not a timed trial

HireLogic

  • Focused on live interview notes and scoring, not a full ATS
  • Fits teams that will keep human interviewers in the chair
  • Quoted packaging can follow volume rather than a rigid self-serve cap
  • No public rate card
  • Easy to confuse with unrelated HireLogic products in search
  • No published trial length or self-serve signup

What each one costs

Carv

$60/user/mo

Free trial of 5 meetings. Recruiter Pro from about $60/user/mo. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 15 Sep 2026

HireLogic

Sales-quoted

HireLogic does not publish plan prices on hirelogic.ai. Interview intelligence (structured notes, scoring, live-interview signal) is quoted through sales. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 19 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try Carv or HireLogic for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Carv alternatives All HireLogic alternatives Every Interviewing tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 15 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?