Compare/Head to head

Alfa AI vs IntelliHR.ai

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Alfa AI

Quote-based

UK-built AI recruiter that runs a role from brief to shortlist: it sources from 800M+ profiles, posts job ads to LinkedIn and Indeed, has an AI avatar called Lisa interview every applicant over audio or video, scores each one with evidence and syncs the shortlist into your ATS. Pricing is quoted after a demo, so it suits teams with enough open roles to justify a sales process.

Where Alfa AI fits

  • In-house TA teams running many roles with a small recruiting staff
  • Agencies that want overnight screening of inbound applicants
  • Teams on Bullhorn, JobDiva, Ceipal or Loxo that want sourced and screened candidates pushed in
  • UK and European employers that need GDPR, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 coverage

IntelliHR.ai

$440/position

IntelliHR.ai is a Hungarian AI recruitment platform that runs the hire for you: it writes and runs the job ads on Meta and LinkedIn, scores every applicant with reasons and interviews the best by chatbot, while you decide who is interviewed and who gets an offer. It is priced per position from $440 with the ad budget included, and the Full ATS tier costs 15% more.

Where IntelliHR.ai fits

  • Companies hiring a handful of roles a year without an ad budget
  • Blue-collar and high-volume roles filled through Meta ads
  • EU employers that need GDPR and EU AI Act alignment
  • Staffing agencies that want ads and screening in one fee

At a glance

DetailAlfa AIIntelliHR.ai
Starting priceQuote-based$440/position
Free tier–No–No
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underSourcing, AI interviewing, Interviewing, AI screening, AI sourcingAI screening, ATS, AI interviewing, Recruitment marketing

Where they pull apart

Alfa AI

Stands out: It covers both outbound sourcing and inbound screening in one agent, where most rivals do one or the other, and the 24/7 avatar interview means applicants are screened the night they apply. The ATS list is unusually long at more than 75 systems, covering US agency tools like Bullhorn, JobDiva, Ceipal and Loxo as well as Workday, Greenhouse and many European ATSs.

Watch out: There is no public price, no trial and no self-serve sign up, so cost is unknown until a demo. Video avatar interviews put it squarely under rules such as NYC Local Law 144 and the EU AI Act; the FAQ lists those questions without answers on the page, so ask for its bias audit before rolling it out. There is no API or MCP, and outside reviews are not yet available.

Not the right fit for

  • Buyers who need a published price or a trial before a demo
  • Teams that want to wire candidate data into their own tools through an API
  • Executive or senior searches where an avatar first interview could put candidates off

IntelliHR.ai

Stands out: The package price per position includes the Meta and LinkedIn ad spend, so one fee covers attracting applicants as well as screening them, which suits teams without their own job advertising budget. Every score comes with reasoning, strengths and risks, candidate identifiers are masked before the AI evaluates them, and the vendor states EU hosting in Frankfurt and alignment with the EU AI Act.

Watch out: Prices are per position rather than per seat, so they climb quickly for teams with many open roles, and final prices change by target country because ad costs differ. The Full ATS features cost 15% more, API integration with existing HR systems only comes on the quoted 25+ tier, and voice interviews are still in beta. The company is based in Hungary, and every order starts with a quote request rather than self-serve sign-up.

Not the right fit for

  • Teams with dozens of open roles who want seat-based pricing
  • Buyers who need an API without a custom contract
  • US teams that want US-based support and data hosting

Pros and cons

Alfa AI

  • Sourcing, job ads and AI interviews in one agent
  • 24/7 avatar interviews screen applicants overnight
  • Two-way sync with 75+ ATSs including Bullhorn and Workday
  • No public pricing or trial
  • No API or MCP server
  • Avatar interviews need a bias audit check before use

IntelliHR.ai

  • Meta and LinkedIn ad spend included per position
  • Scores come with reasons, strengths and risks
  • EU hosting with masked AI evaluation
  • Per-position pricing adds up for many roles
  • API only on the quoted 25+ tier
  • Voice interviews still in beta

What each one costs

Alfa AI

Quote-based

Quote-based. Alfa AI does not publish pricing or a free trial; access starts by booking a demo. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 19 Oct 2026

IntelliHR.ai

$440/position

IntelliHR.ai prices by open position, net of tax, and each package includes the Facebook and LinkedIn advertising budget for that position. The base AI Recruitment package is $440 for 1 position, $2,090 for 5 (5% off), $4,048 for 10 (8% off) and $9,680 for 25 (12% off). The Full ATS tier, which adds the chatbot interview, pipeline, interview, offer and requisition modules, dashboards and the AI audit log, costs 15% more. Above 25 positions is quoted, with a tailored ATS, API integration with existing HR systems, priority support and an account manager. Add-ons are Extra Meta Boost (+$95) and LinkedIn advertising (+$159). Because ad costs vary by country, final pricing depends on your target market. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 29 Oct 2026

Common questions

Can you try Alfa AI or IntelliHR.ai for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Alfa AI alternatives All IntelliHR.ai alternatives Every Sourcing tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 19 Oct 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?