Compare/Head to head

Loxo vs Signals

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Loxo

$149/user/mo

Agency ATS with AI sourcing, sequences and a Chrome extension. Core is $149/user/mo billed annually and paid up front; Professional is priced by demo.

Where Loxo fits

  • Agencies that outgrew a spreadsheet and a job board
  • Desks that want sourcing next to the ATS
  • Teams that want MCP on the ATS of record
  • Buyers happy to pay annually up front

Signals

$139/user/mo

Signals (recruitwithsignals.com) is an AI-native ATS and CRM for agency recruiters. The listing floor is $139/user/mo.

Where Signals fits

  • Recruitment agencies replacing a lightweight CRM with an AI ATS
  • Desks comparing a $139/user seat with Loxo at $149/mo
  • Teams that want ATS plus CRM in one login, not a BD lead sub
  • Owners who will not confuse this with Recruit Signals lead gen

At a glance

DetailLoxoSignals
Starting price$149/user/mo$139/user/mo
Free tier–No–No
MCP server✓Yes–No
Public API✓Yes–No
Listed underATS, CRMATS, CRM
Capterra4.6 from 134 reviewsNot enough reviews

Where they pull apart

Loxo

Stands out: An ATS plus a sourcing database and MCP, built for agency desks.

Watch out: The published Core price is annual billing, and the MCP URL is issued in-product.

Not the right fit for

  • In-house talent teams that need structured hiring kits
  • Buyers working to a sub-$100 per-seat budget

Signals

Stands out: It is the agency system of record (jobs, candidates, clients), not the Recruit Signals lead feed on recruitsignals.com.

Watch out: Per-user billing at $139 is above Happlicant's $69/user quarterly seat and in Loxo's neighborhood. Confirm AI sourcing versus pipeline-only on the live table.

Not the right fit for

  • In-house TA teams that need Greenhouse-style structured hiring
  • Buyers who only wanted the €99 Recruit Signals lead feed

Pros and cons

Loxo

  • Public $149/user/mo Core
  • Free migration for teams of 3+ seats
  • MCP plus API on an agency ATS
  • Annual plans paid up front
  • Professional price needs a demo
  • Not built for in-house structured hiring

Signals

  • Agency ATS plus CRM with an AI-native pitch
  • Published $139/user/mo listing versus Bullhorn-class quotes
  • One login for jobs, candidates, and clients
  • Per-user cost is higher than Happlicant's $69 quarterly seat
  • Easy to mix up with Recruit Signals lead gen
  • Live AI feature-to-plan map needs a pricing-page check

What each one costs

Loxo

$149/user/mo

Core starts at $149 per user per month, billed annually and paid up front. Professional, which adds Loxo Source on its 850M+ talent graph, the full set of AI agents, API access and 2,500 credits per seat a month, is priced by demo. Enterprise is a custom annual agreement. Loxo's pricing page no longer shows a free trial. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

Signals

$139/user/mo

Signals lists from $139/user/mo for an AI-native ATS and CRM aimed at agency recruiters. Confirm live user minimums, AI features, and annual billing on the vendor pricing page. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

Common questions

Is Loxo cheaper than Signals?
Signals starts lower, at $139/user/mo against $149/user/mo for Loxo. That is the entry plan on each side, so the real number depends on seats and the tier you land on.
Can you try Loxo or Signals for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing.
Does Loxo or Signals have an MCP server?
Loxo ships a first party MCP server, so an AI assistant can work the product directly.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Loxo alternatives All Signals alternatives Every ATS tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 4 Nov 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?