Compare/Head to head
Harver vs Maki People
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
Starting price
Compare/Head to head
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
Starting price
Sales-quoted
Volume hiring platform with predictive assessments, video interviews and reference checks. Quote-based.
Where Harver fits
Sales-quoted
AI hiring agents for screening, assessments and interviews that sit on top of your ATS. Credit-based and quote-based.
Where Maki People fits
| Detail | Harver | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Sales-quoted | Sales-quoted |
| Free tier | –No | –No |
| MCP server | –No | –No |
| Public API | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Listed under | Assessments, Interviewing | Assessments, Interviewing, AI interviewing |
Harver
Stands out: Combines assessments, pymetrics game-based tests, video interviews and Checkster reference checks under one vendor.
Watch out: Pricing is sales-quoted and built around volume and modules, so expect a demo and scoping before any number.
Not the right fit for
Maki People
Stands out: You pay for candidate interactions on credits, not recruiter licenses, across four named agents.
Watch out: No public rate card. Pricing is set per deal, and the product targets enterprise volume hiring.
Not the right fit for
Harver
Maki People
Harver
Sales-quoted
Sales-quoted. No public rate card on the vendor site. Pricing depends on hiring volume and which modules you take (assessments, video interviews, reference checks). Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 4 Nov 2026
Maki People
Sales-quoted
Sales-quoted. No public rate card on the vendor site. Agents run on a credit model tied to candidate interactions rather than recruiter licenses. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 4 Nov 2026
All Harver alternatives All Maki People alternatives Every Assessments tool
Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 4 Nov 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?