Head to head

eNPS Tools vs FeedbackPulse

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

eNPS Tools

Free Free tier

A free eNPS calculator for HR and people ops leads who already have survey results and want to know whether the score is good. It compares your eNPS with the closest benchmark by industry, company size and region at no cost, but it does not run the survey itself. Pair it with a form tool or survey software for collection.

Where eNPS Tools fits

  • HR leads who ran eNPS in Google Forms or a survey tool and need outside context for the score
  • Founders and first HR hires reporting eNPS to leadership for the first time
  • People teams planning a survey launch, reminder and report-back dates

FeedbackPulse

$4/employee/mo Free tier Free trial

A low cost pulse survey and review tool for teams of about 10 to 200: free for up to 10 people, then $4 per employee a month on annual Pro for anonymous surveys, eNPS benchmarks, 360 and performance reviews. It suits a founder or first HR hire who wants a monthly listening habit running this week, not a mid-market platform with compensation, HRIS and a procurement process.

Where FeedbackPulse fits

  • Founders and first HR hires at 10 to 200 person companies starting a monthly pulse or eNPS habit
  • Teams that bounced off Culture Amp or Lattice minimums and want a published per employee price
  • Small companies running their first structured review or 360 cycle
  • HR leads who want to query survey results from Claude or ChatGPT

At a glance

DetaileNPS ToolsFeedbackPulse
Starting priceFree$4/employee/mo
Free tier✓Yes✓Yes
Free trialNot on recordYes
MCP server–No✓Yes
Public API–No✓Yes
Listed underEngagement, People analyticsEngagement, Performance

Where they pull apart

eNPS Tools

Stands out: It refuses to fake precision: filters only apply where benchmark records exist, a country filter never falls back to a different country, and when nothing fits it shows "No close benchmark" and tells you to treat the score as a baseline. The site uses no cookies, analytics or ad trackers, and the toolkit worksheets keep entries in your browser.

Watch out: Benchmark sources are kept internally, so you cannot see which survey or year a matched record comes from; read the comparison as directional. Only three checks are free per visit before it asks for a work email. The site is run by Hindcast LLC, the company behind FeedbackPulse, which sponsors it, so its eNPS software comparison page is written by a vendor in that list.

Not the right fit for

  • Teams that need a tool to send the survey and collect anonymous responses
  • Analysts who need the named source and date behind every benchmark figure
  • Enterprises wanting benchmarks cut by department, manager or tenure

FeedbackPulse

Stands out: Prices are published and low: Pro at $4 per employee a month includes reviews, 360 feedback and AI summaries that bigger platforms sell as separate modules, and kudos come free on every plan. Survey answers stay hidden until three people respond, and a first-party MCP server lets an admin pull results or launch a survey from inside Claude or ChatGPT.

Watch out: Slack and Microsoft Teams, where many teams actually answer pulse surveys, sit on the Max plan at $8 per employee a month, double Pro. Goals are Max only too. There is no HRIS, payroll or compensation module, so employee data lives in its own directory. It is a small vendor (Hindcast LLC, registered in Wyoming in 2025) that relies on its hosting providers' certifications rather than its own SOC 2, and says itself that it does not chase 500 seat enterprise security reviews. Production data is hosted in the EU.

Not the right fit for

  • Enterprises that need a vendor security review, SOC 2 report or procurement track
  • Teams that want pulse surveys inside Slack or Teams on the cheapest paid plan
  • Companies after one platform for HRIS, compensation and learning as well as feedback

Pros and cons

eNPS Tools

  • Free, with no account needed for the core calculator
  • Shows no match instead of inventing a benchmark
  • No cookies, analytics or ad trackers
  • Does not send surveys or collect responses
  • Benchmark sources are not shown per record
  • Email required after three checks per visit

FeedbackPulse

  • Free plan for up to 10 people, then a published $4 per employee price
  • Reviews, 360 feedback and kudos included rather than sold as add ons
  • First-party MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT with admin controls
  • Slack and Microsoft Teams integrations only on the $8 Max plan
  • Goals also locked to the Max plan
  • No HRIS, compensation or learning modules

What each one costs

eNPS Tools

Free

Free. The calculator needs no account. After three benchmark checks in a visit, adding a work email unlocks seven more. The results brief, response rate calculator and timeline planner are free with no account. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 28 Sep 2026

FeedbackPulse

$4/employee/mo

Free covers up to 10 people and five active or scheduled surveys. Pro is $4 per employee a month billed annually, or $5 billed quarterly, and adds unlimited surveys, performance reviews, 360 feedback, eNPS benchmarks and AI insights. Max is $8 per employee a month billed annually, or $10 billed quarterly, and adds goals, advanced analytics and Slack and Microsoft Teams integrations. Enterprise is quoted. Paid plans come with a free trial and no card is needed for the free plan. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 26 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try eNPS Tools or FeedbackPulse for free?
eNPS Tools and FeedbackPulse carry a free tier on our listing. FeedbackPulse offers a free trial.
Does eNPS Tools or FeedbackPulse have an MCP server?
FeedbackPulse ships a first party MCP server, so an AI assistant can work the product directly.

Not the pair you wanted?

All eNPS Tools alternatives All FeedbackPulse alternatives Every Engagement tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 28 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?