Quick verdict: 3D printing is not failing as an industry; it grew 10.9% to $24.2 billion in 2025, according to Wohlers Report 2026. It is failing inside individual factories. Only 39% of end users say they consistently get a positive return, and 98% of manufacturers in a Materialise survey report barriers to adoption.
The biggest barrier is people: recruiting expert staff (36%) and lack of in house know how (33%) top the list, ahead of cost. Material problems come next, cited by 85% of decision makers in Jabil’s survey and 61% in Wohlers’ (as material qualification).
Updated October 9, 2026. Figures checked against the Wohlers, Materialise, Jabil, CONTEXT, UK government, Deloitte and Formlabs sources linked below.
How often does 3D printing adoption fail in manufacturing?
Nobody publishes a single failure rate, but the return data is the closest proxy. In Wohlers Report 2026, only 39% of end users said they consistently achieve positive returns from additive manufacturing, and another 36% get returns only on select projects, per the Wohlers 2026 summary. By Work Insiders arithmetic, that leaves roughly a quarter not reporting a return on any regular basis.
Struggle is almost universal. In a survey of 327 manufacturers in the US, Germany and Japan, 98% said they experience challenges and barriers to adopting 3D printing, even though they believe in the business value, according to the Materialise survey. Materialise described the shift as moving from “why” to “how”.
| Adoption signal | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| End users consistently getting a positive return | 39% | Wohlers Report 2026 |
| End users getting returns on select projects only | 36% | Wohlers Report 2026 |
| Manufacturers facing barriers to adoption | 98% | Materialise |
| Respondents who had dismissed the technology | 9% | Materialise |
| Decision makers expecting only moderate growth in use | Seven in 10 | Jabil 2023 |
| Leadership sees AM as a strategic capability | 55% | Jabil 2023 |
Is the 3D printing industry growing or shrinking?
Growing, but more slowly and unevenly than before. Global additive manufacturing revenue reached $24.2 billion in 2025, up 10.9%, well below the 20% plus growth seen before the pandemic, according to the Wohlers 2026 release. Printing services grew 15.5% while system sales grew only 3.6%.
That split is itself a sign of failed in house adoption. Companies increasingly buy printed parts from service providers rather than buy machines, which Wohlers frames as an industry focused on using installed capacity rather than adding hardware.
Did 3D printer sales fall?
Yes, in the industrial segment. CONTEXT data showed shipments of industrial printers costing $100,000 or more fell 24% year on year in the third quarter of 2024, with midrange systems down 8%, while entry level printers under $2,500 rose 28%, according to CONTEXT shipment data. In 2025 the middle kept shrinking: CONTEXT data cited in the Wohlers 2026 summary show midrange shipments fell 16% in the first quarter and 13% in the third.
Why do 3D printing projects fail?
Mostly people and materials, then cost. Materialise found the top barrier was difficulty recruiting an expert workforce (36%), followed by lack of experience and knowledge inside the company (33%). Running costs and equipment costs were each cited by 25%, speed for volume production by 23%, and integration with existing manufacturing by 20%.
Newer data points the same way. Wohlers Report 2026 found material qualification was the most cited barrier, at 61%, and cost constraints were a current concern for 53%. Post processing alone accounts for 18% of polymer part costs and 24% of metal part costs, a hidden expense many business cases leave out.
| Barrier | Share citing it | Survey |
|---|---|---|
| Material cost and availability issues | 85% | Jabil 2023 (up 31% from 2021) |
| Material costs as a financial barrier | 79% (from 18% in 2021) | Jabil 2023 |
| Material qualification | 61% | Wohlers 2026 |
| Cost constraints, current | 53% | Wohlers 2026 |
| Recruiting an expert workforce | 36% | Materialise |
| Lack of internal experience | 33% | Materialise |
| Running or equipment cost | 25% each | Materialise |
| Speed for volume production | 23% | Materialise |
| Integration with existing lines | 20% | Materialise |
Why are materials such a problem?
Because the right ones are often not available or not certified. Nine in ten decision makers in the Jabil survey said their biggest materials challenge is that the materials they need are not available, and 96% would use metal additive materials if certified versions were available at a reasonable cost.
How often do 3D prints fail?
It depends heavily on the machine. In third party lab testing commissioned by Formlabs, its Form 4 and Form 3+ resin printers each failed 1.3% of 225 prints, while two low cost benchmark resin printers failed 13.8% and 25.3%, according to the Formlabs reliability test. Formlabs defined the test procedure, so treat the comparison as a vendor test.
Field results are lower than the lab. Formlabs reports a 94% field print success rate for Form 4, meaning about 6% of real world prints failed. The same post cites a 2024 3D Printing Industry survey in which leaders named machine and process reliability the top barrier to broader adoption.
| Printer in Formlabs test | Price at test | Failure rate | Lost printing hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form 4 | $4,500 | 1.3% | 9 |
| Form 3+ | $2,500 | 1.3% | 17 |
| Benchmark A | $450 | 13.8% | Over 100 |
| Benchmark B | $650 | 25.3% | Over 250 |
How many manufacturers actually use 3D printing?
A minority. In a weighted survey of 3,175 UK firms, only 17% reported using 3D printing at any level, compared with 24% in the EU and 20.2% in the US in 2024, according to a UK government study published in August 2025. Among SMEs, 17.1% had adopted it in the North West against 11% in the rest of the UK.
Even adopters use it lightly: 77.7% of those North West SMEs used it at low or moderate capacity. And the main reason for not adopting was not cost. Almost 55% of companies said the technology was not applicable to their business, and about 22% reported no barriers yet still did not use it.
Large users look very different. Jabil’s survey of 200 decision makers, mostly at companies with over $5 billion in revenue, found 97% use 3D printing for functional or end use parts and 74% printed at least 10,000 parts in a year. Materialise found 60% of US respondents use it for end parts, against 43% in Germany and 36% in Japan.
Is there a 3D printing skills gap?
Yes, and it is the barrier companies name first. Two of the top three barriers in the Materialise survey are about people: hiring experts and lacking internal know how. 3D Printing Industry’s 2026 executive survey adds that customer education is the dominant obstacle, because many teams still design parts using assumptions borrowed from injection moulding or CNC machining.
The wider factory talent market makes it harder. In the Deloitte 2025 survey of 600 large manufacturers, 48% had moderate to significant challenges filling production and operations management roles, and 69% to 72% reported the same for IT, OT, data science and engineering roles. Our guides on CAD career skills and PLC programming cover neighbouring skill sets.
What should you ask when hiring an additive manufacturing engineer?
Test the skills behind the failure causes above: design for additive, materials and qualification, post processing cost, and production integration. Score each answer from 1 to 4 and hire only candidates who score at least 3 on the questions that match your own biggest barrier.
| Skill tested | Interview question | A strong answer covers |
|---|---|---|
| Design for additive | Tell me about a part you redesigned for printing rather than copying a machined design. | Part consolidation, orientation, supports, measurable weight or lead time change |
| Materials and qualification | How did you qualify a material or process for an end use part? | Test plan, standards used, sign off owner, timeline |
| Post processing cost | What share of part cost was post processing on your last project, and how did you cut it? | Real numbers, support strategy, finishing steps removed |
| Reliability | Walk me through a build that failed and what you changed. | Root cause, failure mode, process change, follow up results |
| Business case | When did you advise not to print a part? | Volume, unit cost comparison, honest trade off |
| Integration | How did printed parts fit into your existing quality and production systems? | Inspection, traceability, handoff to the line |
| Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 4 | Specific project, real numbers, clear personal role, lesson applied later |
| 3 | Specific project and role, some numbers, sensible reasoning |
| 2 | General answer, team credit only, no numbers |
| 1 | Theory or vendor talking points with no hands on example |
Use a short note like this when you approach passive candidates:
Subject: Your additive work on [project]
Hi [Name],
I saw your work on [project or part]. We are moving [part family] from prototypes to production printing and the hard part is qualification and post processing cost, not the printers.
Would you be open to a 20 minute call to compare notes on how you handled that? Happy to share our numbers too.
[Your name]
For a structured approach to testing these skills rather than degrees, see our skills based hiring playbook, and the cost of a bad hire data for why getting this role right matters.
How do you avoid a failed 3D printing rollout?
Start from the barriers, not the machine. Budget for post processing and material qualification before buying hardware, since Wohlers shows post processing alone is 18% to 24% of part cost and qualification is the most cited barrier. Use a service provider first for end use parts, which is where the market’s growth already sits, and buy in house capacity once volumes justify it.
Then solve the people problem early. Hire or train one person who owns design for additive and qualification, because the two people barriers top the Materialise list, ahead of every cost item. Materialise found adopters planned most expansion in house (71%) rather than outsourced (8%), which only works with that expertise in place.
How we built this page
We used Wohlers Report 2026 as published by Wohlers Associates and summarised by 3D Printing Industry, the Materialise survey of 327 manufacturers (March 2023), Jabil’s survey of 200 decision makers (July 2023), CONTEXT shipment data, a UK government study of 3,175 firms (August 2025), Deloitte’s 2025 survey of 600 executives and Formlabs’ commissioned reliability test. The share without regular returns is Work Insiders arithmetic. We removed earlier figures that came from unrelated AI studies or could not be traced to a primary source, including a claimed 83% failure rate.
Quick answers
What percentage of 3D printing projects fail?
No study publishes a clean failure rate. The best proxy: only 39% of end users consistently get a positive return, per Wohlers Report 2026.
What is the biggest barrier to 3D printing adoption?
Recruiting an expert workforce (36%) in the Materialise survey, and material qualification (61%) in Wohlers Report 2026.
How big is the 3D printing market?
$24.2 billion in 2025, up 10.9%, with printing services the largest segment at $11.7 billion.
How many manufacturers use 3D printing?
About 17% of UK firms use it, against 24% of EU firms and 20.2% of US firms in 2024, according to a UK government study.
What is a normal 3D print failure rate?
In Formlabs’ commissioned lab test, 1.3% for its own printers and 13.8% to 25.3% for low cost benchmarks; its field success rate for Form 4 was 94%.
Are industrial 3D printer sales falling?
Industrial shipments fell 24% year on year in Q3 2024 and midrange shipments kept falling through 2025, while entry level printers grew.
Is there a 3D printing skills shortage?
Yes. Hiring experts and lacking in house knowledge are the top two barriers in the Materialise survey, at 36% and 33%.
The bottom line
3D printing adoption fails at the factory level, not the industry level. The market keeps growing, but fewer than four in ten users get a dependable return, and growth has moved from selling printers to selling printed parts.
The fixes are unglamorous: qualified materials, honest post processing costs and, above all, people who know how to design and qualify parts for additive. Hire that skill first and the machines become a much safer bet.
Sources: Wohlers 2026 release, Wohlers 2026 summary, Materialise survey, Jabil survey, CONTEXT shipment data, 3DPI executive survey, UK government study, Deloitte 2025 survey, Formlabs reliability test
Free newsletter
Get the Work Insiders weekly
One email a week: the recruiting and HR tech news that mattered, the tools we just added to the directory, and one practical guide. No spam, and you can unsubscribe in one click.