Compare/Alternatives

Sorinai alternatives

3 tools our write-ups put next to Sorinai, with starting price, free tier, MCP and API side by side.

Sorinai from $15/user/moFree tierMCP server

Closest alternatives

See the Sorinai listing

The short answer

  • Fathom : Bigger name with unlimited free recordings and CRM field sync on Business, but it summarises rather than filling your own screening sheet and has no ATS writeback either. From $15/user/mo
  • Metaview : Built for recruiting interviews with ATS integration, priced from $60/user/mo, if you need notes written into your ATS rather than a filled document. From $60/user/mo
  • Carv : Interview write ups and ATS fill aimed at recruiting agencies, if pushing candidate records into the ATS matters more than a free plan. From $60/user/mo

Why people look past Sorinai

There is no ATS connector, so the filled sheet is downloaded and uploaded by hand. Unlimited document fill needs the $15 Personal plan, the free plan's MCP only reaches the last 30 days, and the product is young with no outside reviews yet.

What we noted

  • No ATS writeback
  • Unlimited document fill needs a paid plan
  • New product with no outside reviews yet

Not the right fit for

  • Teams that need interview notes written back into an ATS automatically
  • Recruiters who take calls on a mobile phone rather than through a computer

Worth keeping in mind: The live checklist built from your own sheet shows which questions are still unasked while the candidate is on the line, and afterwards the same Word or PDF comes back filled with its formatting intact. Because it listens to your computer's audio rather than sending a bot, it covers WhatsApp, FaceTime and dialler calls as well as video meetings.

Sorinai alternatives compared

ToolFree tierFromMCPAPIHead to head
Sorinai (the one you are on) ✓Yes$15/user/mo✓Yes–No
Fathom Bigger name with unlimited free recordings and CRM field sync on Business, but it summarises rather than filling your own screening sheet and has no ATS writeback either. ✓Yes$15/user/mo–No✓YesHead to head
Metaview Built for recruiting interviews with ATS integration, priced from $60/user/mo, if you need notes written into your ATS rather than a filled document. ✓Yes$60/user/mo✓Yes–NoHead to head
Carv Interview write ups and ATS fill aimed at recruiting agencies, if pushing candidate records into the ATS matters more than a free plan. –No$60/user/mo–No–NoHead to head

What each one does differently

Fathom

$15/user/mo Free tier Free trial API

Why it comes up: Bigger name with unlimited free recordings and CRM field sync on Business, but it summarises rather than filling your own screening sheet and has no ATS writeback either.

Stands out: Fathom's free plan has no cap on recordings, transcripts or instant summaries, and paid plans come with a 90 day money back guarantee.

Watch out: There is no ATS writeback, only CRM sync. Team and Business need at least two users, and Team works out cheaper than the individual Premium plan.

Best for

  • Solo recruiters who want an uncapped free note taker
  • Agency desks that live in a CRM for client work
  • Teams that share call highlights through playlists

Read the Fathom write-up Sorinai vs Fathom

Metaview

$60/user/mo Free tier MCP

Why it comes up: Built for recruiting interviews with ATS integration, priced from $60/user/mo, if you need notes written into your ATS rather than a filled document.

Stands out: Notes land on the candidate record rather than in someone's document.

Watch out: Each agent is priced separately, so adding Sourcing ($100 or $300 per user) or Application Review ($150 a month) to the $60 Notetaker adds up fast.

Best for

  • Recruiters who dislike writing up interviews
  • Teams that need notes on the ATS record
  • Buyers who want a free start

Read the Metaview write-up Sorinai vs Metaview

Carv

$60/user/mo

Why it comes up: Interview write ups and ATS fill aimed at recruiting agencies, if pushing candidate records into the ATS matters more than a free plan.

Stands out: Joins the interview, writes the note, and pushes a candidate presentation back to Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable.

Watch out: Packaging is demo-led and the product now leans toward agentic volume hiring, so confirm the seat price on a call rather than budgeting from the $60 figure. The five-meeting free plan is a usage cap, not a timed trial.

Best for

  • Recruiting agencies that live on intake calls
  • Desks on Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable
  • Recruiters drowning in notes and write-ups

Read the Carv write-up Sorinai vs Carv

Common questions

What is the best Sorinai alternative?
It depends on what sent you looking. Our write-ups put Fathom closest to Sorinai. Why it comes up: Bigger name with unlimited free recordings and CRM field sync on Business, but it summarises rather than filling your own screening sheet and has no ATS writeback either. The table above shows all 3 on price, free tier, MCP and API.
Is there a free alternative to Sorinai?
Yes. Fathom and Metaview carry a free tier on our listing, so you can try the product without a card. Free tiers are capped, so check the limits against your volume before you move a team across.
What is the cheapest Sorinai alternative?
Of the published starting prices here, Fathom is lowest at $15/user/mo. Starting price is the entry plan, not the seat count you will end up on, so read the plan table on each listing.
Which Sorinai alternatives have an MCP server?
Metaview ships a first party MCP server, so you can drive it from Claude or ChatGPT without building against the API yourself.

Keep looking

Back to the Sorinai write-up Every AI note takers tool we list Search the whole directory

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 9 Oct 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?