Head to head

GitRoll vs Prog.ai

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

GitRoll

Free scan; contact for hiring plans

GitHub-evidence scoring for engineering hiring, with a free scan path and hiring plans sold through the vendor. GitRoll does not publish paid tier prices.

Where GitRoll fits

  • Engineering hiring teams that want GitHub evidence, not another coding-test vendor
  • Startups willing to start with a free scan before buying a hiring workspace
  • Teams sourcing outside the usual FAANG-resume pool
  • Recruiters who want agentic profiles instead of a static GitHub URL

Prog.ai

Sales-quoted

Prog.ai is a developer graph built from GitHub contributions, covering 60M+ engineers scored across tens of thousands of skills. Platform access is sales-quoted. The Chrome extension is free.

Where Prog.ai fits

  • Technical recruiters who hire from GitHub more than from job boards
  • Desks that want Likely-to-Move and scored skills while browsing LinkedIn
  • Teams building bulk engineer lists to export into an outreach tool
  • Companies competing with LinkedIn Recruiter on developers who barely keep a LinkedIn

At a glance

DetailGitRollProg.ai
Starting priceFree scan; contact for hiring plansSales-quoted
Free tierNoNo
MCP serverNoNo
Public APINoNo
Listed underAssessments, InterviewingSourcing, AI sourcing

Where they pull apart

GitRoll

Stands out: GitRoll scores real GitHub work (CURISM and ACID assessments) instead of resume keywords, aimed at finding undervalued builders in a 150M+ developer graph.

Watch out: GitRoll does not publish a self-serve rate card. Treat hiring seats as a quoted conversation.

Not the right fit for

  • TA teams that need a printed per-seat rate before a demo
  • Non-engineering hiring where GitHub evidence does not exist

Prog.ai

Stands out: Likely-to-Move and skill scores come from actual code, not self-reported LinkedIn bullets. The Chrome extension (updated June 2026) overlays those insights on LinkedIn, GitHub, Stack Overflow, and Kaggle.

Watch out: The vendor does not publish a self-serve plan table on getprog.ai. Contact and bulk-list access sit behind a sales conversation. This is software-engineer sourcing, not a general talent graph.

Not the right fit for

  • Non-engineering recruiting
  • Buyers who need a published monthly SKU before a demo

Pros and cons

GitRoll

  • Scores real GitHub work instead of self-reported resume stacks
  • Free scan path so you can test a profile before buying hiring seats
  • Company page also offers a placement fee path if you want managed matching
  • No published paid SaaS rates
  • Placement fees (0.25% interview, 4.5% of salary) are a different commercial model than seats
  • Useless for roles with no public code history

Prog.ai

  • 60M+ engineers ranked from GitHub code, not resume keywords
  • Free Chrome extension on LinkedIn, GitHub, Stack Overflow, and Kaggle
  • Likely-to-Move plus skill scores from real contributions
  • Full platform is sales-quoted. No homepage plan table
  • Engineer-only graph
  • Native outreach connectors to sequencers are still rolling out

What each one costs

GitRoll

Free scan; contact for hiring plans

A free scan path is the public entry. Hiring software plans are listed as Short, Tall, Grande, and Venti on the homepage, and the for-companies page also quotes a 0.25% initial interview fee plus 4.5% of salary on placement. Confirm the live SaaS grid on gitroll.io before budgeting seats. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 19 Sep 2026

Prog.ai

Sales-quoted

Prog.ai does not publish a plan table on getprog.ai. The Chrome extension is free. Full database, contacts, and bulk list access are quoted. Request a conversation from the site. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 19 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try GitRoll or Prog.ai for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing.

Not the pair you wanted?

All GitRoll alternatives All Prog.ai alternatives Every Assessments tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 19 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?