Compare/Head to head

Amor vs Prog.ai

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Amor

Quote Free tier

GitHub first sourcing tool for technical recruiters that ranks engineers by what they actually commit, not what they post on LinkedIn. A free tier lets you try it, but paid prices are not published and export is built around Ashby.

Where Amor fits

  • Technical recruiters hiring software engineers
  • Agencies placing developers who skip LinkedIn
  • Teams on Ashby

Prog.ai

Sales-quoted

Prog.ai is a developer graph built from GitHub contributions, covering 60M+ engineers scored across tens of thousands of skills. Platform access is sales-quoted. The Chrome extension is free.

Where Prog.ai fits

  • Technical recruiters who hire from GitHub more than from job boards
  • Desks that want Likely-to-Move and scored skills while browsing LinkedIn
  • Teams building bulk engineer lists to export into an outreach tool
  • Companies competing with LinkedIn Recruiter on developers who barely keep a LinkedIn

At a glance

DetailAmorProg.ai
Starting priceQuoteSales-quoted
Free tier✓Yes–No
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underSourcingSourcing, AI sourcing

Where they pull apart

Amor

Stands out: It filters on real coding behaviour, contribution frequency, consistency, weekend activity and languages, across more than 8 million GitHub profiles, and cleans messy GitHub locations into searchable cities and countries.

Watch out: It only covers engineers active on public GitHub, so it misses developers whose work sits in private repos. Paid pricing is not published, and the one named export format is Ashby's CSV.

Not the right fit for

  • Non technical hiring
  • Roles where most work sits in private repos
  • Buyers who need published pricing

Prog.ai

Stands out: Likely-to-Move and skill scores come from actual code, not self-reported LinkedIn bullets. The Chrome extension (updated June 2026) overlays those insights on LinkedIn, GitHub, Stack Overflow, and Kaggle.

Watch out: The vendor does not publish a self-serve plan table on getprog.ai. Contact and bulk-list access sit behind a sales conversation. This is software-engineer sourcing, not a general talent graph.

Not the right fit for

  • Non-engineering recruiting
  • Buyers who need a published monthly SKU before a demo

Pros and cons

Amor

  • Finds engineers who are not on LinkedIn
  • Filters on actual commit behaviour
  • Free tier with no card
  • Paid pricing not published
  • Public GitHub activity only
  • Export built around Ashby

Prog.ai

  • 60M+ engineers ranked from GitHub code, not resume keywords
  • Free Chrome extension on LinkedIn, GitHub, Stack Overflow, and Kaggle
  • Likely-to-Move plus skill scores from real contributions
  • Full platform is sales-quoted. No homepage plan table
  • Engineer-only graph
  • Native outreach connectors to sequencers are still rolling out

What each one costs

Amor

Quote

Amor has a free tier with limited search results and no credit card required. Paid plan prices are not published on the vendor site. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 26 Sep 2026

Prog.ai

Sales-quoted

Prog.ai does not publish a plan table on getprog.ai. The Chrome extension is free. Full database, contacts, and bulk list access are quoted. Request a conversation from the site. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 19 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try Amor or Prog.ai for free?
Amor carries a free tier on our listing.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Amor alternatives All Prog.ai alternatives Every Sourcing tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 26 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?