Compare/Head to head

Humanly vs Senseloaf

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Humanly

Quote-based

High-volume screening over chat and SMS, with interview notes in the same flow. Quote-based.

Where Humanly fits

  • High-volume hourly hiring
  • Talent teams that screen over SMS
  • Teams that want notes attached to the candidate
  • Employers comparing conversational hiring tools

Senseloaf

$199/mo 14 day free trial

End to end AI screening for teams drowning in applicants: SIA matches, prescreens and video interviews every candidate, explains every grade and writes results back to your ATS. Published pricing starts at $199/mo with a free trial, but credits, interview caps and a paid ATS integration add on mean real volume lands on Growth or a custom deal.

Where Senseloaf fits

  • Staffing firms and RPOs screening many requisitions across clients
  • Mid market TA teams with more applicants than recruiters can read
  • Teams that need explainable, audit ready AI screening

At a glance

DetailHumanlySenseloaf
Starting priceQuote-based$199/mo
Free tier–No–No
Free trialNot on record14 day free trial
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underATS, Interviewing, AI screening, TextingAI screening, Interviewing, AI interviewing

Where they pull apart

Humanly

Stands out: Conversational screening is the product rather than a feature bolted onto a tracker.

Watch out: No published price, and it is the wrong shape for executive search.

Not the right fit for

  • Executive search
  • Buyers who need a published price

Senseloaf

Stands out: Every score traces back to criteria you approved and opens beside the evidence that produced it, and SIA's memory carries your team's choices into every future role. Public, credit based pricing with a 14 day trial and no card is rare for an end to end AI screening and interview platform.

Watch out: Credits are spent per applicant matched and per prescreen, and only 10 or 25 AI interviews are included a month, so high volume teams will buy top ups. Full bidirectional ATS integration is a separately scoped add on below Enterprise, and adaptive interviews and job simulations are Enterprise only.

Not the right fit for

  • Teams hiring a handful of roles a year
  • Buyers who want unlimited interviews on a flat fee
  • Companies needing full ATS sync on a starter budget

Pros and cons

Humanly

  • Chat, SMS and notes in one product
  • Built for volume rather than executive search
  • Connects to the major enterprise trackers
  • No published price
  • No API or MCP

Senseloaf

  • Public pricing with a 14 day free trial and no card
  • Every grade linked to the evidence and criteria behind it
  • Matching, prescreening and interviews in one pipeline
  • Credit based usage adds cost at volume
  • Full ATS integration is a paid add on below Enterprise
  • Only 10 to 25 AI interviews included per month

What each one costs

Humanly

Quote-based

Quote-based. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 7 Sep 2026

Senseloaf

$199/mo

Starter is $199/mo billed annually or $219 monthly, with 3 seats (up to 5 at $39 each), 1,500 credits and 10 AI interviews a month. Growth is $499/mo annually or $549 monthly, with 5 seats (up to 10 at $59 each), 4,500 credits, 25 interviews and white glove onboarding. Credits cover matching (1 each), prescreens (1) and verification (2); extra interviews run $6.25 to $6.95. Full bidirectional ATS integration is an add on below Enterprise, which is quoted. A 14 day free trial includes 500 credits and 5 interviews with no card. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 23 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try Humanly or Senseloaf for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing. Senseloaf offers a 14 day free trial.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Humanly alternatives All Senseloaf alternatives Every ATS tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 7 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?