Compare/Head to head

Amor vs GitRoll

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Amor

Quote Free tier

GitHub first sourcing tool for technical recruiters that ranks engineers by what they actually commit, not what they post on LinkedIn. A free tier lets you try it, but paid prices are not published and export is built around Ashby.

Where Amor fits

  • Technical recruiters hiring software engineers
  • Agencies placing developers who skip LinkedIn
  • Teams on Ashby

GitRoll

Free scan; contact for hiring plans

GitHub-evidence scoring for engineering hiring, with a free scan path and hiring plans sold through the vendor. GitRoll does not publish paid tier prices.

Where GitRoll fits

  • Engineering hiring teams that want GitHub evidence, not another coding-test vendor
  • Startups willing to start with a free scan before buying a hiring workspace
  • Teams sourcing outside the usual FAANG-resume pool
  • Recruiters who want agentic profiles instead of a static GitHub URL

At a glance

DetailAmorGitRoll
Starting priceQuoteFree scan; contact for hiring plans
Free tier✓Yes–No
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underSourcingAssessments, Interviewing

Where they pull apart

Amor

Stands out: It filters on real coding behaviour, contribution frequency, consistency, weekend activity and languages, across more than 8 million GitHub profiles, and cleans messy GitHub locations into searchable cities and countries.

Watch out: It only covers engineers active on public GitHub, so it misses developers whose work sits in private repos. Paid pricing is not published, and the one named export format is Ashby's CSV.

Not the right fit for

  • Non technical hiring
  • Roles where most work sits in private repos
  • Buyers who need published pricing

GitRoll

Stands out: GitRoll scores real GitHub work (CURISM and ACID assessments) instead of resume keywords, aimed at finding undervalued builders in a 150M+ developer graph.

Watch out: GitRoll does not publish a self-serve rate card. Treat hiring seats as a quoted conversation.

Not the right fit for

  • TA teams that need a printed per-seat rate before a demo
  • Non-engineering hiring where GitHub evidence does not exist

Pros and cons

Amor

  • Finds engineers who are not on LinkedIn
  • Filters on actual commit behaviour
  • Free tier with no card
  • Paid pricing not published
  • Public GitHub activity only
  • Export built around Ashby

GitRoll

  • Scores real GitHub work instead of self-reported resume stacks
  • Free scan path so you can test a profile before buying hiring seats
  • Company page also offers a placement fee path if you want managed matching
  • No published paid SaaS rates
  • Placement fees (0.25% interview, 4.5% of salary) are a different commercial model than seats
  • Useless for roles with no public code history

What each one costs

Amor

Quote

Amor has a free tier with limited search results and no credit card required. Paid plan prices are not published on the vendor site. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 26 Sep 2026

GitRoll

Free scan; contact for hiring plans

A free scan path is the public entry. Hiring software plans are listed as Short, Tall, Grande, and Venti on the homepage, and the for-companies page also quotes a 0.25% initial interview fee plus 4.5% of salary on placement. Confirm the live SaaS grid on gitroll.io before budgeting seats. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 19 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try Amor or GitRoll for free?
Amor carries a free tier on our listing.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Amor alternatives All GitRoll alternatives Every Sourcing tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 26 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?