Compare/Alternatives

ScreeningHive alternatives

3 tools our write-ups put next to ScreeningHive, with starting price, free tier, MCP and API side by side.

ScreeningHive from $15/moFree tierAPI

Closest alternatives

The short answer

Hireflix : Unlimited interview responses on flat plans from $75/mo billed yearly, better once volume passes ScreeningHive's 500 interview cap, but no free plan. From $75/mo
Willo : Per role pricing from $59/role/mo with more integrations, suited to teams hiring for a few roles at a time rather than a steady monthly volume. From $59/role/mo
Spark Hire : Adds live video interviews and wider ATS coverage from $249/mo, for teams that need more than one-way screening and can pay for it. From $249/mo

Why people look past ScreeningHive

Plans are capped by interview count (5, 50, 150 or 500), so high volume or seasonal hiring can outgrow even Enterprise. There is no AI scoring, transcription or skills testing, only human review. ATS connection is through the open API rather than named ready made integrations. No refunds once a plan starts, downgrades wait for the term to end, and free plan data older than six months is archived. The site lists custom branding on every plan while its FAQ says the logo is a Team and Enterprise feature, so check before buying Starter.

What we noted

Every plan caps the number of interviews
No AI scoring, transcripts or assessments
No refunds once a subscription starts

Not the right fit for

High volume hiring above 500 interviews a month
Teams that want AI scoring, transcripts or skills tests
Buyers who need ready made connectors to a named ATS

Worth keeping in mind: Pricing is low and fully published, from a free plan to $79/mo billed yearly for unlimited users, where most one-way video tools start at $59 to $250 a month. Recruiters get fine control over each question (required or optional, how many retakes), candidates get a practice run before recording, and recordings can go to a client or hiring manager by secure link with no login.

ScreeningHive alternatives compared

Tool	Free tier	From	MCP	API	Head to head
ScreeningHive (the one you are on)	✓Yes	$15/mo	–No	✓Yes
Hireflix Unlimited interview responses on flat plans from $75/mo billed yearly, better once volume passes ScreeningHive's 500 interview cap, but no free plan.	–No	$75/mo	–No	–No	Head to head
Willo Per role pricing from $59/role/mo with more integrations, suited to teams hiring for a few roles at a time rather than a steady monthly volume.	–No	$59/role/mo	–No	–No	Head to head
Spark Hire Adds live video interviews and wider ATS coverage from $249/mo, for teams that need more than one-way screening and can pay for it.	–No	$249/mo	–No	✓Yes	Head to head

What each one does differently

Hireflix

$75/mo 30 day free trial

Why it comes up: Unlimited interview responses on flat plans from $75/mo billed yearly, better once volume passes ScreeningHive's 500 interview cap, but no free plan.

Stands out: Every plan includes unlimited seats, unlimited positions, unlimited interview responses, and the full feature set. Price only changes with company size.

Watch out: Small is for companies under 50 employees. Medium is $150/mo billed yearly for 50 to 250. Agencies and high-volume corporates go Custom.

Best for

SMBs under 50 employees that want unlimited one-way video without per-response overages
Teams that already live in Greenhouse and want to invite from the ATS
High-application roles where watching async answers beats scheduling screens

5.0 on Capterra from 257 reviews

Read the Hireflix write-up ScreeningHive vs Hireflix

Willo

$59/role/mo 14 day free trial

Why it comes up: Per role pricing from $59/role/mo with more integrations, suited to teams hiring for a few roles at a time rather than a steady monthly volume.

Stands out: Priced per live role rather than per seat, with a long list of supported trackers.

Watch out: Priced in pounds, and there is a large gap between the entry plan and enterprise.

Best for

Small and mid-sized teams running async screens
Teams on Greenhouse, Workable, Lever or Ashby
Hiring managers who review on their own time

4.7 on Capterra from 39 reviews

Read the Willo write-up ScreeningHive vs Willo

Spark Hire

$249/mo API

Why it comes up: Adds live video interviews and wider ATS coverage from $249/mo, for teams that need more than one-way screening and can pay for it.

Stands out: Unlimited video interviews at a public $249/month annual start, then a full ATS if you want sourcing and workflows in the same vendor.

Watch out: The ATS (Recruit Pro) starts at $335/month billed annually, not $249. AI resume review and notetaker hours are metered by ATS plan. No free trial is advertised.

Best for

TA teams replacing live first rounds with one-way video
SMBs that want video without an enterprise HireVue contract
Companies that may grow into Spark Hire's ATS

4.7 on Capterra from 109 reviews

Read the Spark Hire write-up ScreeningHive vs Spark Hire

Common questions

What is the best ScreeningHive alternative?

It depends on what sent you looking. Our write-ups put Hireflix closest to ScreeningHive. Why it comes up: Unlimited interview responses on flat plans from $75/mo billed yearly, better once volume passes ScreeningHive's 500 interview cap, but no free plan. The table above shows all 3 on price, free tier, MCP and API.

What is the cheapest ScreeningHive alternative?

Of the published starting prices here, Willo is lowest at $59/role/mo. Starting price is the entry plan, not the seat count you will end up on, so read the plan table on each listing.

Keep looking

Back to the ScreeningHive write-up Every Interviewing tool we list Search the whole directory

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 25 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?