Compare/Head to head

Endorsed vs Ropes

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Endorsed

$249/user/mo Free trial

Fraud screen for applicant pools: Endorsed checks every candidate against up to 700+ signals (resume, social, IP and device, phone, email, identity) and flags likely fakes inside your ATS. The free trial needs no card; Growth is $249 per user a month billed annually with a three seat minimum, so the real floor is about $9,000 a year. Best for teams already seeing fake or proxy applicants on remote roles.

Where Endorsed fits

  • TA teams hiring remote engineering or IT roles that attract fake applicants
  • Recruiters who want fraud flags inside the ATS before scheduling interviews
  • Teams that also want AI ranking of real applicants against written criteria

Ropes

Sales-quoted

Candidate fraud detection plus job-specific coding assessments, built for staffing firms that submit technical candidates to clients. Scout screens applicants in the ATS for fake identities and masked locations, and each assessment produces a replayable proof of skill to send with the submittal. Pricing is quote only, and it suits tech staffing desks rather than non-technical or high volume hourly hiring.

Where Ropes fits

  • IT staffing firms submitting remote developers to clients
  • Agencies that have been burned by proxy interviews or fake identities
  • Recruiters who want proof of coding skill to send with each submittal
  • Firms worried about hiring from sanctioned countries through masked locations

At a glance

DetailEndorsedRopes
Starting price$249/user/moSales-quoted
Free tier–No–No
Free trialYesNot on record
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underCandidate fraud & AI detectionCandidate fraud & AI detection, Assessments

Where they pull apart

Endorsed

Stands out: It catches fraud at the application stage, before anyone books an interview, by combining network signals (IP, device, VPN, phone and email) with resume and social checks, where most fraud tools in this category watch the live video interview. The pricing page publishes signal counts, accuracy claims and exactly what each tier includes.

Watch out: Endorsed began as an AI applicant review and sourcing tool and now leads with fraud detection, with applicant review sold as an add-on, so check the current product matches what you need. The three seat annual minimum puts Growth at roughly $9,000 a year before add-ons, and volume is capped at 5 jobs per user. Accuracy figures are the vendor's own.

Not the right fit for

  • Solo recruiters, given the three seat annual minimum
  • Teams whose fraud problem is proxies or deepfakes during live video interviews
  • High volume hourly hiring where 5 jobs per user is too few

Ropes

Stands out: It pairs two jobs most tools split: fraud screening at intake (Scout reads phone, email, resume, LinkedIn, GitHub and IP signals straight from the ATS) and a proctored coding task generated from the client's own job spec, so there is no question bank for candidates to memorise. The result is a shareable replay the recruiter sends with the submittal, which is aimed squarely at staffing sub-to-placement rates rather than in-house hiring teams.

Watch out: No public price, and every route in is a demo. The assessments are technical (coding and data), so they add little for non-technical roles. The headline figures on the site, 39% of candidates showing a fraud signal and a 30% lift in sub-to-place, are the vendor's own data. The only ATS connection documented by a partner is Workable, so confirm your ATS before a trial. Ropes flags signals for a recruiter to review and does not reject candidates itself.

Not the right fit for

  • Non-technical or hourly volume hiring
  • Small teams that want a self-serve plan with a published price
  • In-house teams that only need identity verification

Pros and cons

Endorsed

  • Catches fake applicants before an interview is booked
  • Free trial with no card, and published tier contents
  • Signals span network, device and identity data, not just the resume
  • Three seat annual minimum on Growth
  • AI applicant review costs extra
  • 5 jobs per user cap on Growth

Ropes

  • Fraud checks at intake and during the assessment in one product
  • Coding tasks generated from each job spec, with no test bank to leak
  • Replayable proof of skill to send with each submittal
  • No public price, demo only
  • Assessments cover technical roles only
  • Few documented ATS integrations

What each one costs

Endorsed

$249/user/mo

The free trial costs $0, needs no card and checks 350+ fraud signals with the Chrome extension. Growth is $249 per user a month billed annually, with a three seat minimum, 5 jobs per user (50 total), 700+ signals, fraud analytics, SOC 2 Type II and two way ATS sync, for companies up to 1,000 employees. AI Applicant Review and company data enrichment are add-ons. Enterprise is quoted, with unlimited volume, risk patterns written to the ATS and dedicated success. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 23 Sep 2026

Ropes

Sales-quoted

Ropes does not publish a price. Scout and Assessments are sold through a 30-minute demo tailored to your ATS and workflow. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 25 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try Endorsed or Ropes for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing. Endorsed offers a free trial.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Endorsed alternatives All Ropes alternatives Every Candidate fraud & AI detection tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 23 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?