No published price, and it is a platform rather than a sourcing tool.
What we noted
Not the right fit for
Worth keeping in mind: The career site and the internal bench share one skills model.
| Tool | Free tier | From | MCP | API | Head to head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | –No | Sales-quoted | –No | ✓Yes | |
| | –No | Sales-quoted | –No | ✓Yes | Head to head |
| | –No | Enterprise | –No | ✓Yes | Head to head |
| | –No | Sales-quoted | –No | ✓Yes | Head to head |
| | –No | $130/mo | ✓Yes | ✓Yes | Head to head |
Sales-quoted API
Why it comes up: Configurable enterprise CRM if the skills model is not the buying reason.
Stands out: You shape the data model to the organisation rather than fitting into a fixed pipeline.
Watch out: It needs a team to configure and maintain, so it is not a quick deployment.
Best for
Enterprise API
Why it comes up: Talent experience platform if the career site is the centre.
Stands out: The career site is the product, not an afterthought bolted onto a tracker.
Watch out: No published price, and it is far more platform than a small team needs.
Best for
Sales-quoted API
Why it comes up: Skills-graph matching if internal mobility is the whole story.
Stands out: Skills-graph matching plus internal mobility, rather than another application inbox.
Watch out: No published price, no MCP, and it usually sits on top of an existing ATS rather than replacing it.
Best for
$130/mo MCP API
Why it comes up: Mid-market CRM if you are not buying an enterprise platform.
Stands out: CRM and outreach layered onto the ATS you already have, with a hosted MCP.
Watch out: Pricing scales with company headcount, and anything past a small team is quoted.
Best for
Back to the Beamery write-up Every CRM tool we list Search the whole directory
Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 17 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?