Head to head
AvaHR vs Homerun
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
Small-business ATS for job posting and a simple pipeline. Lite is $99/mo billed yearly, or $119 monthly, with a free trial.
Where AvaHR fits
- Very small in-house teams
- Single-location businesses starting with an ATS
- Teams that want published monthly and yearly pricing
- Buyers comparing small-business trackers
Small-business ATS sold on career sites and a calm hiring flow. Light is €89/mo billed annually, €99 monthly, with a 15-day trial.
Where Homerun fits
- Small in-house teams
- Employers whose career site is the pitch
- European small businesses paying in euros
- Buyers who want a 15-day trial
Where they pull apart
AvaHR
Stands out: Clear published pricing aimed at very small teams.
Watch out: No API and no MCP, so it will not connect to anything else you run.
Not the right fit for
- Agencies
- Enterprise selections
Homerun
Stands out: Career-site quality at small-business scale, with published euro pricing.
Watch out: Job slots cap how many roles you can run at once, which is usually what pushes teams up a tier.
Not the right fit for
- Agencies
- Enterprise selections
- High-volume hourly hiring
Pros and cons
AvaHR
- Published Lite, Plus and Premium pricing
- Cheaper on yearly billing
- Free trial to start
- No API
- No MCP
- Not built for agencies or enterprise
Homerun
- Published euro pricing
- 15-day free trial
- Career site is the product
- No MCP
- Job slots limit concurrent roles
- Not built for agencies or high volume
What each one costs
AvaHR
$99/mo
From ~$49/mo. Confirm current pricing on the vendor site.
Checked 17 Sep 2026
Homerun
€89/mo
From ~$129/mo. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 17 Sep 2026
Common questions
Can you try AvaHR or Homerun for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing. AvaHR offers a free trial. Homerun offers a 15 day free trial.
Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 17 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?