Head to head
ApplicantPro vs Breezy HR
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
US small-business ATS with hiring flows suited to federal contractors. Quote-based, with no API or MCP.
Where ApplicantPro fits
- US small businesses with federal contractor obligations
- Federal contractors at small scale
- Small HR teams posting jobs
- Buyers comparing JazzHR
Visual kanban ATS for small businesses, with a sourcing extension and questionnaires. Paid starts at $157/mo, and there is a free forever plan.
Where Breezy HR fits
- Small hiring teams that want a visual pipeline
- A first ATS after a spreadsheet
- Desks that source in the browser
- Buyers comparing against JazzHR or Workable
Where they pull apart
ApplicantPro
Stands out: Compliance-oriented process support for US federal contractors at small-employer scale.
Watch out: No published price, and compliance-friendly flows are not the same as a compliance audit.
Not the right fit for
- Agencies
- Teams that need MCP or an API
Breezy HR
Stands out: A kanban pipeline plus a sourcing extension, built for small hiring teams.
Watch out: No MCP, and it is not built for enterprise hiring processes.
Not the right fit for
- Enterprise selection processes
- Teams that need MCP
Pros and cons
ApplicantPro
- Compliance-oriented hiring flows
- Aimed at small US employers
- Straightforward positioning
- No published price
- No API
- No MCP
Breezy HR
- Kanban pipeline built for small teams
- Browser sourcing extension
- Free forever plan to start on
- No MCP
- AI features are a paid add-on
- Not an enterprise ATS
What each one costs
ApplicantPro
Sales-quoted
Quote-based. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 17 Sep 2026
Breezy HR
$157/mo
From ~$143/mo. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 17 Sep 2026
Common questions
Can you try ApplicantPro or Breezy HR for free?
Breezy HR carries a free tier on our listing.
Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 17 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?