Head to head

Textio vs UInclude

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Textio

Quote-based

Improves job-post language and flags biased wording before the role goes live.

Where Textio fits

  • Teams writing a lot of job descriptions
  • Programmes that review language before posting
  • Employer-brand teams
  • People teams that want bias flags inside the job description

UInclude

$195/mo Free trial

UInclude is a bias-language checker for job descriptions. Basic is $195 per team per month, billed monthly, with a try-for-free path. Standard, Pro, and custom (more than 50 JDs per month) are quoted.

Where UInclude fits

  • TA teams that want a published monthly language checker instead of a $4,900/year library
  • DEI groups using an inclusion score as a pre-post gate
  • Writers who need gender, race, disability, and age cues in one pass
  • Smaller talent teams that will stay under 50 JDs per month on Basic

At a glance

DetailTextioUInclude
Starting priceQuote-based$195/mo
Free tierNoNo
Free trialNot on recordYes
MCP serverNoNo
Public APINoNo
Listed underJob descriptionsJob descriptions

Where they pull apart

Textio

Stands out: It works on who applies in the first place, rather than ranking people afterwards.

Watch out: No published price, and it is not a sourcing or screening tool.

Not the right fit for

  • Sourcing desks looking for a people search tool
  • Buyers who need a published price

UInclude

Stands out: A performance prediction score rates inclusion as you write. Vendor research says scores over 85 correlate with a higher applicant rate, and the tool targets gender, race, disability, and age-coded language.

Watch out: Basic is a team SKU at $195/mo. Crossing 50 job descriptions per month pushes you to a custom plan. It checks language. It does not govern job architecture.

Not the right fit for

  • Enterprises that need official job architecture, leveling, and ATS writeback
  • Teams posting more than 50 JDs/month that wanted self-serve Basic forever

Pros and cons

Textio

  • Fixes the problem before the post goes out
  • Bias flags built into the writing
  • Works with the major trackers
  • No published price
  • No API or MCP
  • Not a sourcing or screening tool

UInclude

  • Published Basic at $195/team/mo with try for free
  • Inclusion score with a stated 85-plus threshold for applicant lift
  • Covers gender, race, disability, and age in one scan
  • More than 50 JDs/month requires a custom quote
  • No job-architecture, leveling, or pay-transparency library
  • Standard and Pro have no public prices

What each one costs

Textio

Quote-based

Quote-based. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 7 Sep 2026

UInclude

$195/mo

Basic is $195 per team per month, billed monthly, cancel anytime. Standard and Pro are price upon request. A custom plan is required for more than 50 job descriptions per month. Try for free from the pricing page. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 19 Sep 2026

Common questions

Can you try Textio or UInclude for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing. UInclude offers a free trial.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Textio alternatives All UInclude alternatives Every Job descriptions tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 7 Sep 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?