Compare/Head to head

Textio vs UInclude

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Textio

Sales-quoted

Improves job-post language and flags biased wording before the role goes live.

Where Textio fits

  • Teams writing a lot of job descriptions
  • Programmes that review language before posting
  • Employer-brand teams
  • People teams that want bias flags inside the job description

UInclude

$165/team/mo Free trial

UInclude is a bias-language checker for job descriptions. Basic is $165 per team per month billed annually, or $195 billed monthly, with a try-for-free path. Standard, Pro, and custom (more than 50 JDs per month) are quoted.

Where UInclude fits

  • TA teams that want a published monthly language checker instead of a $4,900/year library
  • DEI groups using an inclusion score as a pre-post gate
  • Writers who need gender, race, disability, and age cues in one pass
  • Smaller talent teams that will stay under 50 JDs per month on Basic

At a glance

DetailTextioUInclude
Starting priceSales-quoted$165/team/mo
Free tier–No–No
Free trialNot on recordYes
MCP server–No–No
Public API–No–No
Listed underJob descriptionsJob descriptions

Where they pull apart

Textio

Stands out: It works on who applies in the first place, rather than ranking people afterwards.

Watch out: No published price, and it is not a sourcing or screening tool.

Not the right fit for

  • Sourcing desks looking for a people search tool
  • Buyers who need a published price

UInclude

Stands out: A performance prediction score rates inclusion as you write. Vendor research says scores over 85 correlate with a higher applicant rate, and the tool targets gender, race, disability, and age-coded language.

Watch out: Basic is a team SKU at $165/mo billed annually or $195/mo billed monthly. Crossing 50 job descriptions per month pushes you to a custom plan. It checks language. It does not govern job architecture.

Not the right fit for

  • Enterprises that need official job architecture, leveling, and ATS writeback
  • Teams posting more than 50 JDs/month that wanted self-serve Basic forever

Pros and cons

Textio

  • Fixes the problem before the post goes out
  • Bias flags built into the writing
  • Works with the major trackers
  • No published price
  • No API or MCP
  • Not a sourcing or screening tool

UInclude

  • Published Basic at $165/team/mo billed annually, with try for free
  • Inclusion score with a stated 85-plus threshold for applicant lift
  • Covers gender, race, disability, and age in one scan
  • More than 50 JDs/month requires a custom quote
  • No job-architecture, leveling, or pay-transparency library
  • Standard and Pro have no public prices

What each one costs

Textio

Sales-quoted

Quote-based. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

UInclude

$165/team/mo

Basic is $165 per team per month billed annually ($1,980 a year), or $195 per team per month billed monthly, cancel anytime. Standard (up to 25 job ads a month) and Pro (up to 50 job ads a month) are price upon request. A custom plan is required for more than 50 job descriptions per month. Try for free from the pricing page. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

Common questions

Can you try Textio or UInclude for free?
Neither carries a free tier on our listing. UInclude offers a free trial.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Textio alternatives All UInclude alternatives Every Job descriptions tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 4 Nov 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?