Compare/Head to head
Laidback vs xhuman
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
Starting price
Compare/Head to head
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
Starting price
Sales-quoted Free trial
AI sourcing agent for teams without a dedicated sourcer: brief it in Slack and it researches candidates on the open web, sends outreach under the hiring manager's name and books screening calls into your calendar and ATS. Pricing is one flat plan quoted per company with no per-hire fee, and you can start free on a live role before a three-month pilot.
Where Laidback fits
Sales-quoted Free tier
People-search agent for search firms: describe the mandate in a sentence, xhuman searches the open web and your own network, shows the evidence behind every match, then drafts and paces the outreach from your own mailbox. You can start free after a review; paid plans are not published and are shown in the chat.
Where xhuman fits
| Detail | Laidback | xhuman |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Sales-quoted | Sales-quoted |
| Free tier | –No | ✓Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Not on record |
| MCP server | –No | ✓Yes |
| Public API | –No | –No |
| Listed under | Sourcing, Outreach, Scheduling | Sourcing, Lead generation, LinkedIn, Outreach |
Laidback
Stands out: Laidback builds candidate profiles from what people have published (code repos, talks, papers, portfolios) instead of filtering the same licensed database every competitor uses, and it calibrates each search by simulating candidate personas against the brief before it starts. It will push back on the brief itself, for example arguing against a literal years-of-experience floor, and it chooses whether each message goes out under the hiring manager or the recruiter and over email, LinkedIn or WhatsApp.
Watch out: There is no public price: every deal is quoted on a demo call, followed by a three-month pilot, so budgeting before a sales conversation is not possible. The product lives in Slack, so teams on Microsoft Teams or without Slack should confirm fit first, and the vendor's customer logos and pricing examples lean European (it quotes agency fees in euros).
Not the right fit for
xhuman
Stands out: Every match opens to show why it matched, tracing each criterion back to the talk, post or profile the claim came from, and saying so when the evidence is not strong enough rather than filling the gap. It also reads your own side: connect a mailbox and your LinkedIn network and it can tell you who you already know inside a target account, which a database-first sourcing tool cannot do.
Watch out: The product is in private beta. The vendor no longer publishes plan prices: you start free after a review, and any paid plan is offered inside the chat, so you cannot budget from a public rate card. Companies book a call with the founder. The vendor describes SOC 2 as a programme on its Trust Center rather than a finished report.
Not the right fit for
Laidback
xhuman
Laidback
Sales-quoted
Quote-based. Laidback sells one plan quoted per company, with unlimited sourcing, research, outreach drafting, roles and workspace members, and no credits, seat fees or per-hire percentage. The vendor lets you start free on a live role, then scopes a three-month pilot on your real requisitions. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 4 Nov 2026
xhuman
Sales-quoted
xhuman no longer publishes plan prices. You can start free after a review, and if you want more, xhuman shows the plans inside the chat. Companies that want an agent for every employee book a 20-minute call with the founder. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 4 Nov 2026
All Laidback alternatives All xhuman alternatives Every Sourcing tool
Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 4 Nov 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?