Compare/Head to head
HackerRank vs TestGorilla
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
Starting price
Compare/Head to head
Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.
Starting price
$79/mo
Coding screens, pair interviews, and an AI interviewer. Starter is $79/mo billed annually ($948/year) for 60 attempts.
Where HackerRank fits
$215/mo Free tier
Skills assessments before the interview. Free plan, then Core at $215/mo and Plus from $520/mo.
Where TestGorilla fits
| Detail | HackerRank | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $79/mo | $215/mo |
| Free tier | –No | ✓Yes |
| MCP server | ✓Yes | –No |
| Public API | ✓Yes | –No |
| Listed under | Assessments | Assessments, Candidate fraud & AI detection |
| Capterra | Not enough reviews | 4.1 from 267 reviews |
HackerRank
Stands out: Chakra AI interviewer, Screen, and live Interview on every plan, with MCP and API on Enterprise.
Watch out: Starter and Pro do not include API or MCP. Extra attempts are $20 each. ATS hooks start on Pro.
Not the right fit for
TestGorilla
Stands out: A large test library with anti-cheating measures and a genuine free plan.
Watch out: The jump from Core to Plus is steep, and it is tests rather than video interviewing.
Not the right fit for
HackerRank
TestGorilla
HackerRank
$79/mo
Starter is $79/mo billed annually ($948/year) with 60 candidate attempts. Pro is $419/mo billed annually ($5,028/year) with 360 attempts. Extra attempts are $20 each; Enterprise is sales-quoted. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 4 Nov 2026
TestGorilla
$215/mo
The free plan includes 10 credits a month. Core is $215/mo on an annual commitment ($2,580/yr) and Plus starts at $520/mo. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.
Checked 4 Nov 2026
All HackerRank alternatives All TestGorilla alternatives Every Assessments tool
Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 4 Nov 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?