Compare/Head to head

Arrange vs Atlast

Same facts, side by side: starting price, free tier, MCP, API and what each one is actually built for.

Starting price

Arrange

$35/user/mo Free tier 14 day free trial

Interview scheduling built for the agency recruiter stuck between candidates, clients and hiring managers. Arrange collects availability from each side, matches the earliest time and sends the invites, and clients can start scheduling from a link in your candidate submission without an account. Free for personal booking, Pro is $35 per user a month with a 14-day trial.

Where Arrange fits

  • Agency recruiters coordinating interviews between candidates and clients
  • Recruiting coordinators running panel and multi-round interviews
  • Executive assistants scheduling with outside parties
  • Small recruiting desks on Loxo, Recruiterflow or Crelate

Atlast

€768/mo

European AI hiring platform that works like a talent acquisition team: you brief Atlas, the Hiring Lead agent, and it hands work to Talia (sourcing and outreach), Echo (AI interviews) and Stala (scheduling and candidate messages). It runs alongside your ATS or replaces it with its own. Solo is €768/mo billed annually (€960 monthly) for 5 hiring users, 10 active jobs and 1,000 AI credits a month.

Where Atlast fits

  • European startups and scaleups hiring without a full recruiting team
  • Teams that need EU AI Act and GDPR documentation for their hiring AI
  • Freelance recruiters running several client mandates from one account

At a glance

DetailArrangeAtlast
Starting price$35/user/mo€768/mo
Free tier✓Yes–No
Free trial14 day free trialNot on record
MCP server–No–No
Public API✓Yes–No
Listed underScheduling, InterviewingATS, AI interviewing, Scheduling, AI sourcing

Where they pull apart

Arrange

Stands out: The client-first link is the clever part: drop it into a candidate submission and the client books the interview themselves, with no login and no email chain through you. Calendly and most booking tools assume one person shares one link, while Arrange handles three parties and several rounds.

Watch out: It is a young product from a small team, and ATS integrations shown are agency systems such as Loxo, Recruiterflow and Crelate, so check yours before you buy. ATS sync sits on Pro, and API access only on Enterprise.

Not the right fit for

  • Large corporate teams that need enterprise scheduling inside Workday or Greenhouse
  • Anyone who only needs a simple 1:1 booking link
  • Teams that need API access without an Enterprise contract

Atlast

Stands out: Built for the EU AI Act: it classes its hiring AI as high-risk, keeps an immutable audit trail, hosts data in the EU on AWS, never trains on candidate data, and requires a human to sign off on every hiring decision. Plans are priced by team size rather than per seat, so hiring managers and interviewers join at no extra cost.

Watch out: Prices are in euros with no USD option, there is no self-serve free trial (a live demo instead), and the entry plan is about €9,200 a year. It launched in June 2026; the onboarding and offers agents are still in development, and some ATS integrations are listed as in development.

Not the right fit for

  • US teams that want USD pricing and a self-serve trial
  • Teams that need proven integrations with their current ATS today

Pros and cons

Arrange

  • Built for three-way candidate, client and hiring manager scheduling
  • Clients and candidates need no account
  • Free plan and a 14-day Pro trial
  • Young product with a short list of ATS integrations
  • ATS sync needs Pro, API needs Enterprise
  • Free Starter plan covers only 1:1 booking, not client scheduling

Atlast

  • One brief drives sourcing, interviews and scheduling agents together
  • Built-in ATS, or runs on top of the one you have
  • Strong EU AI Act and GDPR posture with human sign-off on decisions
  • Euro pricing only, from about €9,200 a year
  • No self-serve free trial
  • Launched June 2026, with some agents and integrations still in development

What each one costs

Arrange

$35/user/mo

The Starter plan is free for one person: a personal booking link, one Google or Outlook calendar, Zoom, Meet or Teams links and unlimited 1:1 bookings. Pro is $35 per user a month, or $336 per user a year (about $28 a month), and adds every scheduling flow, hiring manager calendars, multi-calendar support and ATS integrations, with a 14-day free trial. Enterprise is priced on request and adds white-labelled booking links on your own domain, API access, custom onboarding and priority support. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 3 Nov 2026

Atlast

€768/mo

Atlast is priced in euros by plan, not per seat. Solo is €768/mo billed annually (€9,216 a year) or €960 monthly, for up to 5 people involved in hiring, 10 active job postings and 1,000 AI credits a month. Team is €1,440/mo billed annually (€17,280 a year) or €1,800 monthly, for 10 people, 25 jobs and 2,000 credits, with Slack support. Scaleup (25 people, 60 jobs, 5,000 credits) and Enterprise (unlimited users and jobs, Workday and SuccessFactors integrations) are custom and billed annually. Credits are used when an agent acts; monthly credits reset, top-ups roll over. There is no self-serve free trial; the vendor offers a live demo on a real role. Confirm current terms on the vendor site.

Checked 15 Oct 2026

Common questions

Can you try Arrange or Atlast for free?
Arrange carries a free tier on our listing. Arrange offers a 14 day free trial.

Not the pair you wanted?

All Arrange alternatives All Atlast alternatives Every Scheduling tool

Editorial listings, never paid rankings. Prices checked 3 Nov 2026. Confirm current terms on the vendor site. Spot an error?